So, you know know that Duolingo is somewhat effective, but only to a certain point, however, this doesn’t tell you all of the stories. Those who are just starting to learn the language will find it much more effective, while those who are somewhat knowledgeable will find the app to be much less effective. From in-person class lessons, online classes, different computer programs, and even visiting a country that speaks the language, are phone apps, specifically Duolingo, the most effective option?ĭuolingo’s effectiveness is heavily determined by the level of knowledge one is starting at. I'll still use it for Spanish and throw a few errors every twenty-question round (I use the timed practice).There are so many different options available when it comes to learning a new language.

It trains you to do a little every day, which is really important, and builds an addiction to language learning the same way people develop an addiction to angry birds. You need to come up with a combined strategy using other resources, whether it's language meetups, online exchanges or immersion, but it's definitely possible to use Duolingo as the core of a language acquisition program. I had a shit load of problems filling out forms today to receive my final funding allocation as a result of my language learning because I had proceeded a lot faster than they thought was possible, and therefore I confused the people at the British Council. On paper/gradewise, however, I overtook people who have studied it for five years in high school and two in college. I'd say I'm pretty much fluent in Spanish now I can have complex conversations about technical subjects, which puts me somewhere between B2 and C1, though there's lots of words I don't know and I have a relatively amusing way of speaking when using my spoken language skills. I was able to skip two CEFRl levels using it, though I was in a partial immersion environment for nine months.

Is duolingo good